New drug
Capivasertib for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
- Aust Prescr 2026;49:109-11
- 2 June 2026
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2026.021
Background:
Breast cancer that is hormone receptor (HR) positive
and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative is the most
common subtype of breast cancer. Patients who present with locally advanced or
metastatic disease have a poorer prognosis and often require endocrine therapy
in combination with targeted therapy. Current drug therapies approved in
Australia for this indication include cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and
6 inhibitors (e.g. palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) in combination with
endocrine therapy using an aromatase inhibitor (e.g. anastrozole) or
fulvestrant (an estrogen receptor antagonist), as well as the PI3K inhibitor
alpelisib for men and postmenopausal women with a PIK3CA mutation.1 Despite these treatments, many patients
develop drug resistance and experience disease progression.
Mechanism
of action:
Capivasertib
inhibits AKT, which is a key protein in the PI3K–AKT–PTEN signalling pathway that
regulates cell proliferation and survival. In some cancers, including HR-positive
breast cancer, mutations in this pathway lead to overactivation of AKT, promoting
increased cell proliferation and resistance to cell death. AKT activation is
also implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy.2 By inhibiting AKT and thereby blocking
this pathway, capivasertib may reduce tumour cell proliferation and survival.1,3
Clinical trials:
The efficacy of capivasertib was assessed in a phase 3
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (CAPItello-291) in adults with HR-positive,
HER2-negative advanced breast cancer that had progressed during or after
aromatase inhibitor therapy, with or without prior CDK4 or 6 inhibitor treatment
or chemotherapy (n=708, median age 58 years, 77.3% postmenopausal).2 Patients
were randomised to receive either oral capivasertib or placebo, plus intramuscular
fulvestrant. Pre- and peri-menopausal women also received a luteinising hormone–releasing
hormone agonist (e.g. goserelin). Treatment continued until disease
progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death. Mutations
in PIK3CA, AKT1 and PTEN genes were identified in 40.8% of
patients. Key exclusion criteria included prior treatment with fulvestrant or
an AKT, PI3K or mTOR inhibitor, diabetes requiring insulin, and a baseline
glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of at least 8%.
The median treatment duration was 5.4 months with capivasertib and 3.6 months with placebo. Treatment was discontinued in 82.3% of patients receiving capivasertib and 87.7% receiving placebo, most commonly due to disease progression. Progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes are summarised in Table 1.2
Table 1 Progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes from a phase 3 trial (CAPItello-291) in patients with HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer receiving either capivasertib or placebo, in combination with fulvestrant2
| Outcome | Overall study population | AKT pathway–altered population (PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN alteration in tumour) | ||
| Capivasertib plus fulvestrant (n=355) | Placebo plus fulvestrant (n=353) | Capivasertib plus fulvestrant (n=155) | Placebo plus fulvestrant (n=134) | |
|
Median progression-free survival |
7.2 months |
3.6 months |
7.3 months |
3.1 months |
|
Estimated overall survival at 18 months |
73.9% |
65.0% |
73.2% |
62.9% |
| AKT1 = AKT serine/threonine kinase 1; HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR = hormone receptor; PIK3CA = phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha; PTEN = phosphatase and tensin homolog | ||||
For most of the study period, patient-reported global health status and quality of life scores were similar between the treatment groups, except at the beginning of treatment, when lower scores in the capivasertib group were likely due to a higher incidence of diarrhoea.4
Adverse effects:
The most frequently reported adverse effects were diarrhoea (72.4% in
the capivasertib–fulvestrant group versus 20.0% in the placebo–fulvestrant group),
rash (38.0% versus 7.1%), nausea (34.6% versus 15.4%), fatigue (20.8% versus
12.9%) and vomiting (20.6% versus 4.9%). Hyperglycaemia occurred in 16.3% of patients
treated with capivasertib.2 The
most common serious adverse reactions were diarrhoea, rash and vomiting.5
Dosage and administration:
The dose of capivasertib is 400 mg (two 200 mg tablets)
orally twice daily, approximately 12 hours apart (total daily dose of 800 mg),
for 4 days followed by 3 days off treatment. It should be taken with
fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1, 15 and 29, and once monthly thereafter.5
Treatment with capivasertib may be paused or the dose reduced to manage adverse reactions; suggested dose reductions are provided in the Product Information.
Precautions:
Avoid
concurrent use with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers. Dose reduction of
capivasertib may be required with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. No dose
adjustment is needed for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment or
mild hepatic impairment. Data are limited in severe renal impairment, moderate
hepatic impairment, and in patients aged 75 years or above.5
Use in pregnancy and breastfeeding:
Reproductive toxicity has been shown in animal studies. Capivasertib
is classified as Therapeutic
Goods Administration pregnancy category D and should not be used in
pregnancy or women of childbearing potential not using contraception.
Capivasertib may be secreted into breastmilk so it should not be used during
breastfeeding.5
Place in therapy:
The addition of capivasertib to fulvestrant therapy appears to
improve progression-free survival in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative
advanced breast cancer who have experienced disease recurrence or progression with
previous endocrine therapies.2 Capivasertib
can be used in adults with or without PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN
alterations. CDK4 and 6 inhibitors (combined with endocrine therapy) remain the
standard-of-care, first-line treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced
breast cancer. No head-to-head trials between capivasertib and CDK4 and 6
inhibitors have been conducted to date. Other treatment combinations with
capivasertib are under investigation.3
Another AKT inhibitor, ipatasertib, is undergoing clinical trials in Australia and overseas but is not currently an approved treatment in Australia.6,7
Practice points:
Measure fasting blood glucose and HbA1c before and during
treatment, as capivasertib can cause hyperglycaemia. In the presence of dehydration
and sepsis, there is an increased risk of hyperglycaemia progressing to
diabetic ketoacidosis. More frequent blood glucose and ketone monitoring, which
may include self-monitoring, is recommended in patients who develop
hyperglycaemia or have risk factors for diabetic ketoacidosis (e.g. diabetes
mellitus, pre-diabetes, regular oral steroid use).5
Advise patients to start anti-diarrhoeal treatment at the first signs of diarrhoea and maintain adequate oral fluid intake. Monitor for signs of rash. Depending on the severity of the adverse reaction, capivasertib dosing may need to be adjusted or interrupted.
People of childbearing potential should be advised to use effective contraception during treatment and after stopping treatment – at least 4 weeks for females and 16 weeks for males.
This new drug comment was finalised on 20 April 2026. It was prepared by Sherilyn Wong, Clinical Editor, Australian Prescriber, and reviewed by Jeremy Dalziell, Pharmacist Team Leader of Cancer Services (Acting), Mater Hospital, South Brisbane.
At the time this new drug comment was prepared, the Australian Public Assessment Report was available from the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The sponsor did not provide the Clinical Evaluation Report.
This article is peer reviewed.
Australian Prescriber welcomes Feedback.
The new drug comments in Australian Prescriber are prepared by the editors and reviewed by subject matter experts. Some of the views expressed on newly approved products should be regarded as preliminary, as there may be limited published data at the time of publication, and little experience in Australia of their safety or efficacy. Before new drugs are prescribed, it is important that more detailed information is obtained from the approved product information, a medicines information centre or some other appropriate source.
Report all suspected adverse reactions to new drugs to enable continued monitoring of their benefit–harm balance.