Uncertainty still remains about which of the anticholinergic drugs is superior in efficacy, in different patient groups (male, female, elderly) and for particular symptoms. There are also few data on the socioeconomic impact of overactive bladder symptoms or therapy.4
Oxybutynin
Oxybutynin is the most widely used anticholinergic for overactive bladder. Early studies showed a major clinical benefit in 60% of patients (versus 3% of those on placebo) in both objective and urodynamic assessments. Dry mouth is the most bothersome and frequent adverse effect (greater than 50%) and is associated with high discontinuation rates.5 The drug is comparatively inexpensive.
Propantheline
Propantheline is an old drug that is still widely used in Australia. It is a synthetic analogue of atropine that blocks muscarinic receptors at all sites, thus adverse effects can be severe at low serum concentrations. However, propantheline is 60% of the cost of oxybutynin.
Imipramine
Imipramine is a tricyclic antidepressant with beta3 mimetic properties that relax the dome of the detrusor, but it also has significant anticholinergic effects. Drowsiness is common, especially in the first three weeks of therapy while a steady state concentration is achieved. Imipramine may therefore be useful for treating nocturia or nocturnal enuresis.
Tolterodine
Tolterodine is an anticholinergic specifically developed to treat overactive bladder. In vitro, tolterodine has greater specificity for bladder tissue than for salivary glands. A meta-analysis found only four appropriate randomised controlled trials comparing tolterodine with oxybutynin.6 Both drugs are of similar efficacy, with oxybutynin being slightly superior on some outcomes such as incontinence episodes per 24 hours.6 The exact mechanism is not understood, but tolterodine halves the incidence of dry mouth compared to oxybutynin.6
Trospium
Trospium is a non-selective antimuscarinic drug which is frequently used in the UK as second-line therapy. It is as effective as oxybutynin, but has a lower incidence of adverse effects (similar to tolterodine).7 Trospium's structure limits its penetration of the blood-brain barrier and this is thought to reduce central nervous system adverse effects. This feature may be important for elderly patients.
Darifenacin
The efficacy of darifenacin, including quality of life, has been convincingly shown over placebo, but whether there is clear superiority over drugs such as tolterodine remains to be seen. Darifenacin has high M3 receptor specificity, resulting in less impairment of cognitive or cardiac function. Some patients still develop dry mouth and constipation as M3 receptor activity is present in the gut.
Solifenacin
Solifenacin was approved in the USA in 2004. In vitro, it is more selective for bladder tissue than for salivary glands. Studies suggest improvements over placebo with low rates of dry mouth (10%) and greater quality of life.8 A well-powered comparative randomised controlled trial8 found that tolterodine had a lower incidence of unwanted effects and lower discontinuation rates.
Extended-release products
Extended-release formulations of oxybutynin9 and tolterodine8 have been developed. These are thought to reduce concentration-dependent antimuscarinic adverse events by maintaining lower and less fluctuating plasma concentrations. Once-daily administration offers greater convenience and may improve compliance. Both products seem as effective as oxybutynin, but they have a reduced frequency and severity of adverse effects.
What to prescribe
Oxybutynin should be regarded as first-line drug therapy. It fulfils criteria for cost-effectiveness, safety, efficacy, and for a significant proportion of patients, tolerability. Consideration should always be given to behavioural therapies as an adjunct, to achieve and maintain good therapeutic outcomes at the lowest drug doses.10 Patients experiencing unmanageable adverse effects from oxybutynin may benefit from changing to second-line treatments such as tolterodine. Subsequent treatment failure may warrant specialist referral.
Only two small longitudinal studies on the duration of treatment have been carried out. Those patients who require anticholinergic therapy may typically need it for at least 3-6 months.