Philip Boyce and Cassandra Ma, the authors of the article, comment:
We thank Dr Nielsen for his comments. While we agree that we did not define mild–moderate depression, we assumed most GPs would understand the term. We later stated that antidepressants are indicated for depressed patients with marked symptoms and functional impairment.
Screening patients for an organic cause for depression is important and we hope this would be part of routine practice. However, Australian Prescriber commissioned us to write about choosing an antidepressant, not the assessment of patients with depression.
Agitated depression can indicate a ‘mixed state’,2,3 and the possibility of bipolarity (a history of a manic episode) should be examined in any patient presenting with an agitated depression. However, our article was referring to the more common situation in which an agitated depression is not part of a bipolar illness.
Sexual adverse effects are a significant problem and we included them when we rated the limitations of the classes of antidepressants. These ratings were based on our review of the literature and gauging the opinion of experts (the mood disorders guideline working party3) using a Delphi process. Minimum limitations are found with moclobemide, mianserin and agomelatine, while reboxetine, mirtazapine and vortioxetine are rated as having more limitations. We suggested that agomelatine be used for patients with sexual dysfunction based on its efficacy and very low reported levels of sexual dysfunction.4