Lower doses
It seems reasonable to use doses of aspirin which, while lower than those used previously, are still sufficient to exert a maximum inhibitory effect on platelet function. The two main reasons for this are to minimise adverse effects, and to attempt to spare prostacyclin production in the vessel wall.
Adverse effects
The adverse effects of aspirin are mainly gastrointestinal.4 They are dose related so they are reduced at lower doses (325 mg per day or less). Aspirin may cause gastric erosions and gastric ulcers and patients may present with anaemia and/or haemorrhage. Longitudinal studies show that 75 mg daily causes a small but significant increase in gastrointestinal bleeding, and this effect doubles with 300 mg daily and increases 5-fold with 1.8-2.4 g daily.4
An important, but uncommon, adverse effect is haemorrhagic stroke. The incidence was estimated to be 0.7 per 1000 patients treated in a subset of trials where the reduction in ischaemic stroke was 10 per 1000 patients treated.5 However, unlike the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, the risk of haemorrhagic stroke would not be expected to decrease unless very low doses of aspirin were used, doses which do not maximally inhibit platelet function. Currently, there is little or no evidence to indicate that such very low doses would be adequate to prevent thrombosis.
Sparing of prostacyclin production
A further advantage of lower doses of aspirin might be that inhibition of prostacyclin formation in the vessel wall could be minimised. Preservation of prostacyclin production may be valuable in the prevention of thrombosis. Many dosage regimens have been investigated to find one which leads to maximal inhibition of platelet thromboxane formation while sparing inhibition of prostacyclin formation. Most recent studies suggest that any sparing of prostacyclin production is likely to be minimal, and the resultant clinical benefit will be small and therefore difficult to demonstrate in a clinical trial.1 Hence, the arguments for use of lower doses of aspirin continue to rest on the lesser frequency and severity of adverse effects.
Different formulations
Adverse effects
Aspirin is available as soluble, compressed, delayed release and enteric-coated formulations. The incidence and severity of the gastrointestinal adverse effects of increased blood loss and peptic ulceration are low when aspirin is given in doses of about 100 mg daily. However, doses even lower than 100 mg are still associated with bleeding6, and it would seem likely that this could be further reduced by taking delayed release or enteric-coated formulations.
Sparing of prostacyclin production
Oral aspirin has a variable but generally high presystemic (first-pass) clearance. The bioavailability of slow release or enteric-coated formulations can be as low as 25%. For rapid release formulations (such as solutions and compressed aspirin), it is about 50%. The product of presystemic metabolism is salicylate, which has no antiplatelet activity. Thus, especially with slow release or enteric-coated formulations, complete inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase could occur during the time that platelets are in the presystemic (portal) circulation. These formulations could better exploit the capacity of the liver and portal blood to metabolise aspirin to salicylate, so that less aspirin reaches the systemic circulation. This will result in less inhibition of prostacyclin formation by the vessel wall. In practice, any benefit obtained from this strategy is likely to be small.3