Editor, – There are significant problems with the use of literature to support the statements in the article by Dr Singh and Professor Berk on acute management of bipolar disorders (Aust Prescr 2008;31:73-6). The authors have generalised from bipolar I disorder to bipolar II disorder and from severely ill tertiary-treated bipolar I patients to the broader population of patients with bipolar disorder. They have also misrepresented the risk of suicide and the relationship between medication status and relapse risk.
According to the article, 'sufferers spend 32-50% of follow-up in depressive states and only 1-9% in elevated states'. However, the source cited focused on bipolar I disorder and cautioned that 'Generalization to other samples of BP-I may be limited because the CDS cohort consisted of severely ill, tertiary care, white patients'.1Inappropriately generalising biased samples contributes to the clinician's illusion2, which distorts perceptions of chronicity and severity.
The article claimed that over 90% of patients with bipolar disorders relapse without medications. However, in the source cited the relapse rate applied specifically to bipolar I disorder.3The implication that relapse occurs only without medication ignores a large body of evidence that it frequently occurs with medication.4,5,6,7The use of psychotropic drugs between episodes is not associated with time to relapse or recurrence.8
The statement that 15% of people with bipolar disorders die by suicide is based on pharmaceutical industry funded grey literature.9Australian empirical evidence was lacking in this citation and relied on an article by Goodwin and Jamison.10Later, Jamison acknowledged that the quoted risk of 15% may have been too high.11The inflated risk was based largely on inpatient samples, inappropriately generalised to the broader population.
The article largely ignored the value of psychological interventions. There is strong evidence that these are effective in the prevention of relapse. Despite emphasising the destabilisation potential of antidepressants, the authors do not mention the potential adverse effects of antipsychotics and other drugs for bipolar episodes. These include obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and dyslipidaemia.12
These problems with the article exaggerate both the severity of bipolar disorders and the value of medications, while devaluing psychological treatments.
Melissa Raven
Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Public Health
Flinders University, Adelaide