SUMMARY

Device-assisted therapies for Parkinson disease include apomorphine continuous subcutaneous infusion, levodopa continuous intestinal gel infusion, levodopa continuous subcutaneous infusion and deep brain stimulation.

These therapies have a role in managing motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in people with advanced Parkinson disease when symptoms are inadequately controlled with oral and transdermal treatments.

Subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine or levodopa are the least invasive device-assisted therapies. Levodopa intestinal infusion is delivered via a surgically placed intestinal tube. Deep brain stimulation involves implanting electrodes into specific target regions of the basal ganglia to modulate brain activity.

Selecting an appropriate device-assisted therapy depends on individual factors such as age, comorbidities, symptom severity and patient preferences. Initiation and management require neurologist and multidisciplinary involvement, typically in a specialist movement disorder centre.

Primary care clinicians play a crucial role in ongoing support and management for people using these therapies, including monitoring and managing adverse effects and communicating with movement disorder services.

 

Introduction

Parkinson disease is a complex, progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by motor and non-motor symptoms.1 It typically progresses slowly over years, with patients transitioning from early to mid to late stages of disease.2 There are no disease-modifying treatments for Parkinson disease, so management focuses on symptom relief to improve quality of life and minimise disability.3

Most people with Parkinson disease are managed with levodopa and other oral or transdermal drug therapies, but in people with difficult-to-manage symptoms in the later stages of the disease, device-assisted therapies are sometimes beneficial. Device-assisted therapies available in Australia include apomorphine continuous subcutaneous infusion, levodopa continuous intestinal gel infusion, and deep brain stimulation.1,2,4 Levodopa continuous subcutaneous infusion has been approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) but is not yet available in Australia at the time of writing.

This article provides a brief overview of oral and transdermal therapies for Parkinson disease, then describes the device-assisted therapies, and when and how they are used.

 

Oral and transdermal therapies

Early motor symptoms usually respond well to oral levodopa (with benserazide or carbidopa to reduce peripheral conversion of levodopa to dopamine, thus reducing peripheral side effects). This is typically the first-line therapy.

Over time, patients often experience fluctuations in their motor response to levodopa.3 These fluctuations can manifest as a decline in motor response before the next dose (‘wearing-OFF’ phenomenon), a delayed response (‘delayed ON’), or a failure of response (‘no ON’). ‘ON’ periods may be accompanied by abnormal, involuntary movements (dyskinesias), usually occurring as a peak-dose effect.1,3

Several pharmacokinetic factors contribute to these fluctuations, such as delayed gastric emptying and competition from dietary amino acids that impede levodopa absorption.1 Pharmacodynamic factors, including progressive neuron loss, can result in pulsatile dopamine release, leading to overstimulation of receptors (causing peak-dose dyskinesias) and rapid dopamine clearance (causing ‘OFF’ periods).1

To manage fluctuations, adjunctive therapies like dopamine agonists, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors and monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors can be added to levodopa therapy.3,5 Other strategies include shortening levodopa dose intervals, or dividing daily doses into smaller, more frequent administrations. Controlled-release levodopa formulations have a longer half-life and could theoretically improve fluctuations; however, erratic gastrointestinal absorption leads to inconsistent efficacy.1,3,5 Amantadine can be used to treat dyskinesias but has short-lasting efficacy.3,6

A summary of oral and transdermal treatments currently available in Australia is provided in the Appendix. In most patients, motor fluctuations and dyskinesias are relatively mild and can be managed with these therapies. However, in some patients, symptoms persist, causing worsening disability despite optimised medical therapy.1In these patients, device-assisted therapies may be helpful.

 

Device-assisted therapies

Device-assisted therapies for Parkinson disease are a group of specialised treatments used to manage complex and disabling motor fluctuations and dyskinesias that cannot be adequately managed by oral or transdermal therapies alone.1,7,8 Use of device-assisted therapies is typically reserved for those with advanced, complicated disease.

Initiation requires neurologist involvement, usually in a specialist movement disorder centre. Referral criteria for device-assisted therapies have been proposed by Australian movement disorder experts, based on European recommendations (Box 1).4,7,8

Box 1 Criteria for referring patients with Parkinson disease for consideration of device-assisted therapies5,8 [NB1]

  • motor fluctuations causing disability or reduced quality of life
  • inconsistent response to oral and transdermal therapies
  • motor fluctuations or dyskinesias requiring frequent treatment adjustments without apparent benefit
  • oral levodopa required 4 or more times a day
  • severe medication-refractory tremor

NB1: Patients experiencing one or more criteria should be referred for further evaluation.

Each therapy has unique complexities and advantages, discussed below and summarised in Table 1.7,8 Device selection depends on individual patient factors such as age, comorbidities, therapy-specific risks and patient preferences.8,9 For device-assisted therapy to be effective the patient should retain a response to levodopa, except for deep brain stimulation which can be used for medication-refractory tremor.

Table 1 Device-assisted therapies for Parkinson disease2,7-12

Therapy Route of administration Advantages Disadvantages Side effects

Apomorphine continuous subcutaneous
infusion (Apomine, Movapo)

Subcutaneous continuous infusion via portable pump

Less invasive than intestinal levodopa infusion and deep brain stimulation

Easy to discontinue if response insufficient or poor tolerance

Patient usually requires assistance to prepare pump

Pumps must be carried during the day

Pumps are not water resistant, requiring disconnection prior to showers

Infusion-site skin reactions, nausea, orthostatic hypotension, neuropsychiatric effects, haemolytic anaemia (rare), prolonged QT interval (rare)

Levodopa+carbidopa
continuous intestinal
gel infusion (Duodopa)

Levodopa+carbidopa+
entacapone continuous intestinal gel infusion (Lecigon) [NB1]

Continuous infusion to jejunum via PEG-J tube

Can completely replace oral levodopa therapy

Moderately invasive (requires surgical PEG-J tube insertion)

Complications such as infection, bezoar, intestinal obstruction, tube dislodgement or obstruction are common and may cause sudden clinical deterioration

Patient usually requires assistance to prepare daily infusions

Medication cassettes must be stored in the fridge before use

Pumps require frequent battery changes (weekly)

Abdominal pain, surgical site reactions, flatulence, constipation, nausea, neuropathy, peritonitis, aspiration, malabsorption including vitamin B12 deficiency (associated with long-term use)

Foslevodopa+foscarbidopa continuous subcutaneous infusion (Vyalev) [NB1]

Subcutaneous continuous infusion via portable pump

Less invasive than intestinal levodopa infusion and deep brain stimulation

Easy to discontinue if response insufficient or poor tolerance

Can completely replace oral levodopa therapy

Patient usually requires assistance to prepare pump

Pumps must be carried during the day

Infusion-site reactions and infection, nausea, neuropsychiatric effects

Deep brain stimulation

Surgical implantation

May be the preferred option in severe levodopa-induced dyskinesia and severe medication-refractory tremor

Less reliant on daily assistance and may be the preferred option when no family support available

Highly invasive, requiring neurosurgery

Risks of surgical complication such as intracranial haemorrhage, infection and seizures

Ongoing programming required to optimise response

Device-related problems (e.g. lead migration and disconnection) can occur

Higher risk of adverse effects in older patients

Dysarthria, apathy, cognitive decline, depression, headache

PEG-J = percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy NB1: Approved but not yet marketed in Australia at the time of writing

Apomorphine continuous subcutaneous infusion

Apomorphine is a subcutaneously administered dopamine agonist with rapid absorption and a short half-life. It can be given as intermittent bolus injections for rescue therapy, or as a continuous infusion via portable mini-pumps for severe fluctuations.7 Continuous apomorphine infusions have been shown to be effective in improving motor function, significantly reducing daily OFF time and increasing ON time with minimal dyskinesia.13,14

Among the currently available device-assisted therapies, continuous apomorphine infusion is considered the most straightforward to initiate and discontinue (typically done in an outpatient setting), and may be the preferred choice in older patients where other devices may be contraindicated.1,7,9,15

Continuous apomorphine infusions are typically added to oral dopaminergic treatments. Following infusion commencement, other dopamine agonists are usually discontinued, and daytime levodopa is gradually reduced based on symptoms.4,8,14 Use as monotherapy is rarely achieved.8

Dosing and administration

When commencing apomorphine therapy, a trial (‘apomorphine challenge’) is often conducted to confirm dopaminergic responsiveness and help estimate the dose needed.10 Some patients may initially use intermittent subcutaneous bolus dosing as needed, for on-demand rescue therapy, while in others it may be more appropriate to directly commence a continuous infusion.16 Infusions are typically continued for 12 to 16 hours during waking hours, with a usual dose range of 2 to 7 mg/hr.6,16 Troublesome nocturnal OFF symptoms may benefit from an overnight rotigotine transdermal patch, or in rare cases a 24-hour apomorphine infusion.10,17 Most pumps include a bolus function which enables patients to administer additional rescue doses during OFF periods. Frequent bolus use (over 3 times daily) may suggest the continuous hourly rate should be increased, although many patients maintain stable doses for years.10,16,18

Long-term adherence can be challenging and patients often require daily support to initialise the pump.1,9 Training for patients and caregivers is crucial for compliance and preventing adverse events.

Complications and adverse effects

Panniculitis (subcutaneous nodules, erythema and needle-site tenderness) is a common adverse effect associated with apomorphine injection but can be minimised through skin care, rotation of injection site and correct use of cannulas. Nausea is common during initiation but can be minimised with pretreatment domperidone (dosed 10 mg three times a day). Tolerance to nausea develops rapidly, allowing gradual withdrawal of domperidone.6 Rarer side effects include autoimmune haemolytic anaemia and prolonged QT interval (Table 1).6

Levodopa+carbidopa continuous intestinal gel infusion

Levodopa+carbidopa continuous intestinal gel infusion offers consistent drug delivery for patients with advanced Parkinson disease experiencing severe motor complications. Delivering the medication directly to the small intestine bypasses gastric emptying to ensure more stable plasma levodopa levels than may be achieved with oral dosing.19An intestinal gel containing levodopa+carbodopa+entacapone was also recently approved in Australia for advanced Parkinson disease with severe motor fluctuations unresponsive to optimised treatments.

These treatments involve surgical placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension (PEG-J tube) connected to a portable programmable pump worn by the patient. The procedure is invasive, typically requiring hospital admission for tube insertion and dose titration.

Improvement in motor symptoms from intestinal infusions are well-documented in several prospective trials.20-22 A double-blind randomised controlled study showed significant reductions in OFF time and increased ON time without troublesome dyskinesia in levodopa intestinal gel-treated patients.20

Continuous intestinal infusions usually replace oral levodopa, but other oral dopaminergic therapies are often continued.

Dosing and administration

Prior to PEG-J tube insertion, intestinal gel clinical responsiveness may be established via a temporary nasointestinal tube. Following PEG-J tube placement, initial dosing is usually calculated from the total oral levodopa dose prior to infusion commencement and titrated according to response.

Infusions usually run continuously during waking hours and stop overnight to minimise tolerance development. Pumps are typically programmed to deliver a morning bolus dose (usually 100 to 200 mg levodopa) to achieve a quick therapeutic level, followed by a continuous infusion of the maintenance dose (usually 20 to 200 mg per hour). Extra bolus doses (usually 10 to 40 mg per dose) can be administered as required during OFF periods. If more than 5 bolus doses are needed per day, the continuous maintenance dose should be increased. Rarely, infusions may be extended for continuous 24-hour use, usually in patients with significant nocturnal symptoms.

Pump doses are pre-programmed and typically cannot be adjusted by patients or carers. Patients can prepare the levodopa intestinal pump each day, but many need carer assistance. Medication cassettes are single-use and should not be used for longer than 16 hours. Due to poor drug stability, cassettes require refrigeration and have a short expiry.

Complications and adverse effects

Adverse events associated with intestinal levodopa infusions are common. They are usually mild to moderate in severity and predominantly related to surgical complications or device-related problems, such as procedural pain, abdominal pain and infection (Table 1).23 Serious adverse events can occur in up to 50% of individuals and include peritonitis, pneumoperitoneum and pneumonia.21,22 Prolonged exposure has been associated with peripheral neuropathy.24 Adverse event rates decrease over time, and despite the initial high rate, the overall benefit-risk profile remains favourable for long-term use.21

Foslevodopa+foscarbidopa continuous subcutaneous infusion

A continuous subcutaneous infusion containing foslevodopa+foscarbidopa (prodrugs converted to levodopa+carbidopa in vivo) has been approved but is not available in Australia at the time of writing. A potential advantage over intestinal levodopa+carbidopa infusion is that it does not require a hospital admission and surgical procedure for initiation.12

Deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation is an invasive neurosurgical procedure delivering high-frequency electrical currents to specific brain regions. Electrodes are implanted into target regions of the basal ganglia such as the subthalamic nucleus, posterior subthalamic area, globus pallidus interna or occasionally the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus.11The electrodes connect to a pulse generator implanted under the skin, typically near the collarbone with pulses controlled by an external remote.

The effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease is well established, with substantial benefits in reducing OFF time and dyskinesias, and improving motor function, daily functioning and quality of life. Deep brain stimulation has been found to be superior to medical treatment in several randomised controlled trials.25-27 It is typically used in conjunction with oral therapies but often allows for reduced medication dosages.

Eligibility and device management

Access to deep brain stimulation involves referral to a specialist movement disorder clinic and extensive multidisciplinary evaluation. Eligibility is based on factors such as age, levodopa responsiveness and medical comorbidities including cognitive or psychiatric problems.28,29 The surgery is performed by a neurosurgeon and requires hospital admission. Postoperative care involves programming and adjusting the stimulator settings by a neurologist or specialist nurse. Ongoing follow-up is essential to optimise device settings and address complications.

Complications and adverse effects

Potential complications include intracranial haemorrhage, seizures and infection (Table 1). Hardware-related issues, including lead migration or disconnection, can lead to sudden loss of stimulation and acute worsening of motor symptoms. Cognitive and psychiatric side effects, such as depression, anxiety or cognitive decline, can also occur, often limiting use of deep brain stimulation in older people.30

 

Comparison of device-assisted therapies

The evidence base to guide selection of device-assisted therapies in Parkinson disease is limited. No randomised controlled trials have directly compared the 4 device-assisted therapies. Separate studies suggest similar improvements in OFF time, motor fluctuations and dyskinesia.1,8,9 One systematic review found that levodopa intestinal infusions and deep brain stimulation provided superior efficacy over oral and transdermal therapies, but were associated with significantly higher costs.9 Continuous apomorphine infusions were found to be more cost-effective than levodopa intestinal infusions and deep brain stimulation.9,31,32 The costs to patients for apomorphine and levodopa intestinal infusion are similar, as both are subsidised in Australia through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Deep brain stimulation surgery costs are covered by Medicare and private health insurers, but there may be out-of-pocket costs in private hospital settings.

 

Management of device-assisted therapies

Device-assisted therapies are usually managed in specialist movement disorder clinics, typically involving a multidisciplinary team including neurologists, nurses, neurosurgeons, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists and physiotherapists.1,7 Access to movement disorder clinics in Australia can be difficult, particularly in regional and rural areas. Movement disorder nurse specialists are available through these specialist clinics and may provide outreach consultation, education and training. Nurse specialists from pharmaceutical companies are also available to provide community support for patients, caregivers and clinicians, offering education and assistance with the administration and use of equipment.

Before commencing device-assisted therapy, patients should be thoroughly informed about the treatment process and potential outcomes. Collaborative decision-making involving the patient and their carers is essential.7

Regular review by the movement disorder clinic is crucial for dosage adjustments, monitoring side effects, addressing device-related issues and providing ongoing education.7

Ensuring adequate supply of medications is essential, as they may not be readily available in community pharmacies.

Primary care clinicians, particularly general practitioners and pharmacists, play a crucial role in ongoing support and management, including monitoring side effects, communicating with the movement disorder clinic or nurse specialist, and ensuring correct device use (Table 2).

Table 2 Considerations for primary care clinicians caring for patients with Parkinson disease using device-assisted therapies

Consideration Details

Adverse effects and complications to monitor

Apomorphine continuous subcutaneous infusion: Regularly assess for injection-site reactions, QT prolongation, nausea and orthostatic hypotension, especially during dose titration. Use domperidone for nausea management (preferred antiemetic in Parkinson disease). If nausea persists, consider referral to the patient’s neurologist for apomorphine dose re-evaluation.

Levodopa continuous intestinal gel infusions: Watch for surgical complications (e.g. infection at PEG-J tube site) and abdominal symptoms. Severe complications like peritonitis, bezoar, or tube dislodgement may require urgent attention.

Deep brain stimulation: Monitor for postsurgical complications (e.g. intracranial haemorrhage, infection and seizures). Look for early signs of device malfunction (e.g. sudden worsening of symptoms); refer to the patient’s neurologist if any signs of neurological deterioration. Monitor for signs of depression, apathy, or cognitive decline.

Movement disorder specialist support

Contact movement disorder clinic or nurse specialist for urgent issues.

Some pharmaceutical companies offer after-hours hotline support for users of these therapies.

Device management

Monitor for signs of under- or overdosing and liaise with movement disorder clinic for device and dose adjustments.

Education and support

Ensure the patient and caregiver understand how to manage devices, recognise signs of complications, and attend scheduled specialist appointments.

PEG-J = percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy
 

Conclusion

Device-assisted therapies for Parkinson disease, including apomorphine or foslevodopa continuous subcutaneous infusion, levodopa continuous intestinal gel infusion and deep brain stimulation, offer effective management for complex motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Selection of these therapies should be tailored to individual patient needs and managed in specialist movement disorder clinics. Regular review and patient education are crucial for optimising treatment outcomes.

This article was finalised on 11 December 2024.

Conflicts of interest: Nadia Mouchaileh has no conflicts to declare. Jill Cameron received support from Abbvie to attend a conference in 2023, previously received honoraria from Abbvie, CSL Seqirus and Stada for involvement in educational seminars and presentations, and has been on advisory boards for Abbvie and Stada.

This article is peer reviewed.

 

Australian Prescriber welcomes Feedback.

 

References

  1. Hayes MW, Fung VS, Kimber TE, O'Sullivan JD. Updates and advances in the treatment of Parkinson disease. Med J Aust 2019;211:277-83.
  2. Williams L, Qiu J, Waller S, Tsui D, Griffith J, Fung VSC. Challenges in managing late-stage Parkinson's disease: Practical approaches and pitfalls. Aust J Gen Pract 2022;51:778-85.
  3. Mouchaileh N, Hughes AJ. Pharmacological management of Parkinson’s disease in older people. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research 2020;50:445-54.
  4. Odin P, Ray Chaudhuri K, Slevin JT, Volkmann J, Dietrichs E, Martinez-Martin P, et al. Collective physician perspectives on non-oral medication approaches for the management of clinically relevant unresolved issues in Parkinson's disease: Consensus from an international survey and discussion program. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015;21:1133-44.
  5. Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim SY, Barton B, de Bie RMA, Seppi K, et al. International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2018;33:1248-66.
  6. Australian Medicines Handbook Pty Ltd. Drugs for parkinsonism. In: Australian Medicines Handbook. Adelaide; 2024.
  7. Phokaewvarangkul O, Auffret M, Groppa S, Markovic V, Petrovic I, Bhidayasiri R. What was first and what is next in selecting device-aided therapy in Parkinson's disease? Balancing evidence and experience. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2024;131:1307-20.
  8. Williams DR, Evans AH, Fung VSC, Hayes M, Iansek R, Kimber T, et al. Practical approaches to commencing device-assisted therapies for Parkinson disease in Australia. Intern Med J 2017;47:1107-13.
  9. Marsili L, Bologna M, Miyasaki JM, Colosimo C. Parkinson's disease advanced therapies - A systematic review: More unanswered questions than guidance. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021;83:132-9.
  10. Henriksen T, Katzenschlager R, Bhidayasiri R, Staines H, Lockhart D, Lees A. Practical use of apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease: lessons from the TOLEDO study and clinical experience. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2023;130:1475-84.
  11. Hariz M, Blomstedt P. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. J Intern Med 2022;292:764-78.
  12. Aubignat M, Tir M. Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa-Foscarbidopa in Parkinson's Disease: A Mini-Review of Current Scope and Future Outlook. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2024;11:1188-94.
  13. Gaire S, Kafle S, Bastakoti S, Paudel A, Karki K. Continuous Subcutaneous Apomorphine Infusion in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021;13:e17949.
  14. Katzenschlager R, Poewe W, Rascol O, Trenkwalder C, Deuschl G, Chaudhuri KR, et al. Apomorphine subcutaneous infusion in patients with Parkinson's disease with persistent motor fluctuations (TOLEDO): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:749-59.
  15. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Parkinson’s disease in adults. NICE guideline [NG71]. London; 2017. [cited 2024 Aug 02]
  16. Bhidayasiri R, Chaudhuri KR, LeWitt P, Martin A, Boonpang K, van Laar T. Effective delivery of apomorphine in the management of Parkinson disease: practical considerations for clinicians and Parkinson nurses. Clin Neuropharmacol 2015;38:89-103.
  17. Todorova A, Martinez-Martin P, Martin A, Rizos A, Reddy P, Chaudhuri KR. Daytime apomorphine infusion combined with transdermal Rotigotine patch therapy is tolerated at 2 years: A 24-h treatment option in Parkinson's disease. Basal Ganglia 2013;3:127-30.
  18. Trenkwalder C, Chaudhuri KR, Garcia Ruiz PJ, LeWitt P, Katzenschlager R, Sixel-Doring F, et al. Expert Consensus Group report on the use of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson's disease--Clinical practice recommendations. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015;21:1023-30.
  19. Nyholm D, Odin P, Johansson A, Chatamra K, Locke C, Dutta S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levodopa, carbidopa, and 3-O-methyldopa following 16-hour jejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease patients. AAPS J 2013;15:316-23.
  20. Olanow CW, Kieburtz K, Odin P, Espay AJ, Standaert DG, Fernandez HH, et al. Continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:141-9.
  21. Fernandez HH, Boyd JT, Fung VSC, Lew MF, Rodriguez RL, Slevin JT, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2018;33:928-36.
  22. Antonini A, Poewe W, Chaudhuri KR, Jech R, Pickut B, Pirtosek Z, et al. Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's: Final results of the GLORIA registry. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2017;45:13-20.
  23. Lang AE, Rodriguez RL, Boyd JT, Chouinard S, Zadikoff C, Espay AJ, et al. Integrated safety of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel from prospective clinical trials. Mov Disord 2016;31:538-46.
  24. Romagnolo A, Merola A, Artusi CA, Rizzone MG, Zibetti M, Lopiano L. Levodopa-Induced Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2019;6:96-103.
  25. Williams A, Gill S, Varma T, Jenkinson C, Quinn N, Mitchell R, et al. Deep brain stimulation plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD SURG trial): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:581-91.
  26. Okun MS, Gallo BV, Mandybur G, Jagid J, Foote KD, Revilla FJ, et al. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation with a constant-current device in Parkinson's disease: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:140-9.
  27. Vitek JL, Jain R, Chen L, Troster AI, Schrock LE, House PA, et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation with a multiple independent constant current-controlled device in Parkinson's disease (INTREPID): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled study. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:491-501.
  28. Defer GL, Widner H, Marie RM, Remy P, Levivier M. Core assessment program for surgical interventional therapies in Parkinson's disease (CAPSIT-PD). Mov Disord 1999;14:572-84.
  29. Artusi CA, Lopiano L, Morgante F. Deep Brain Stimulation Selection Criteria for Parkinson's Disease: Time to Go beyond CAPSIT-PD. J Clin Med 2020;9.
  30. Olson MC, Shill H, Ponce F, Aslam S. Deep brain stimulation in PD: risk of complications, morbidity, and hospitalizations: a systematic review. Front Aging Neurosci 2023;15:1258190.
  31. Dijk JM, Espay AJ, Katzenschlager R, de Bie RMA. The Choice Between Advanced Therapies for Parkinson's Disease Patients: Why, What, and When? J Parkinsons Dis 2020;10:S65-S73.
  32. Afentou N, Jarl J, Gerdtham UG, Saha S. Economic Evaluation of Interventions in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2019;6:282-90.

 

Appendix

Appendix - Oral and transdermal treatments for Parkinson disease1,6

Drug class Generic (brand) name Advantages Disadvantages

Levodopa with benserazide or carbidopa [NB1]

levodopa+carbidopa IR (Sinemet, Kinson, Sinadopa)

levodopa+benserazide IR (Madopar)

levodopa+carbidopa SR (Sinemet SR)

levodopa+benserazide SR (Madopar HBS)

Most potent dopaminergic effect

Peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibition reduces peripheral dopamine effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, hypotension)

Dispersible tablets may be useful for rapid response

Frequent dosing required with disease progression

Delayed gastric emptying and dietary amino acids can impair absorption

Long-term use associated with increased motor fluctuations and dyskinesias

SR preparations exhibit erratic and unpredictable absorption

Dopamine agonists

pramipexole IR (Sifrol, Simpral, Simipex)

pramipexole SR (Sifrol ER, Simipex XR)

rotigotine transdermal patch (Neupro)

Ergot derivatives:
bromocriptine (Parlodel)
cabergoline (Dostinex, Cabaser)

Improve motor fluctuations when used as adjunctive therapy to levodopa

Can be used as monotherapy in younger people with early disease to delay levodopa use

Patches useful in people with nocturnal symptoms, swallowing difficulties or when unable to take oral therapy (e.g. fasting states)

Risk of impulse control disorders, excessive daytime somnolence and sudden sleep attacks

Risk of confusion and hallucinations greater than levodopa, especially in older people

Application-site reactions associated with patch use

Ergot derivatives:
Risk of cardiac, pulmonary and retroperitoneal fibrosis (rarely used; neurologist input required)

Monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors

rasagiline (Azilect, Alziras)

selegiline (Eldepryl)

safinamide (Xadago)

May be better tolerated than levodopa and dopamine agonists

Rasagiline can be used as monotherapy in mild disease

Improve motor fluctuations when used as adjunctive therapy to levodopa

Less effective than levodopa and dopamine agonists

Associated with serotonin toxicity

Avoid night-time dosing due to risk of insomnia

Safinamide contraindicated in patients with retinal problems (retinal degeneration reported in animal studies)

Catechol-O- methyltransferase inhibitors

entacapone (Comtan)

opicapone (Ongentys)

Improve motor fluctuations when used as adjunctive therapy to levodopa

Once-daily dosing option available with opicapone

Available as carbidopa+levodopa+entacapone formulation (Stalevo)

Urine, skin, hair and nail discolouration associated with entacapone use

Opicapone may reduce levodopa absorption if administered simultaneously, separate by at least 1 hr

Anticholinergics

benzatropine (Benztrop)

trihexyphenidyl, also known as benxhexol (Artane)

May improve tremor symptoms

Can be useful as adjunctive therapy in dystonia management

Rarely used due to anticholinergic side effects

Risk of cognitive impairment in older patients

Other

amantadine (Symmetrel, Amantamed)

Useful as adjunctive therapy for treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias

Efficacy reduced with long-term use

Risks of gastrointestinal and neuropsychiatric side effects

IR = immediate release; SR = sustained release NB1: Benserazide and carbidopa are peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitors. They reduce peripheral conversion of levodopa to dopamine, thus reducing adverse effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, hypotension) and improving central bioavailability.
 

Nadia Mouchaileh

Senior Pharmacist, Austin Health, Melbourne

Adjunct Lecturer, Monash University, Melbourne

Jillian Cameron

Head of Movement Disorders and Consultant Neurologist, Austin Health, Melbourne