Diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndromes
- Joanne Eng-Frost, Derek Chew
- Aust Prescr 2021;44:180-4
- 1 December 2021
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2021.049
Acute coronary syndromes are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia. Outcomes are likely to be improved by rapid and accurate diagnosis, and early intervention.
The development of high-sensitivity troponin assays has revealed previously unrecognised types of myocardial injury, for which conventional management guidelines for myocardial infarction may not confer similar benefits. The distinction between myocardial injury and myocardial infarction has therefore become increasingly important.
Once the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction has been made, individualised acute reperfusion strategies including percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolytic therapy should be considered. Secondary prevention strategies should be implemented before hospital discharge.
Acute coronary syndromes encompass myocardial infarction and unstable angina. Although survival has improved, acute coronary syndrome remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Australia.
Previous management guidelines largely focused on timely coronary reperfusion to reduce the size of the infarcted area. Current management guidelines focus on the need to establish an accurate diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. High-sensitivity troponin assays have led to greater and earlier identification of patients experiencing an acute coronary syndrome. However, the lowered troponin reference threshold has also unmasked a host of previously unrecognised types of myocardial injury for which conventional management may not confer similar survival benefits.
A diagnosis of myocardial infarction can no longer be based solely on elevated concentrations of troponin. Myocardial infarction as a result of atherosclerotic plaque rupture is termed a type 1 myocardial infarction in the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (see Fig.).1 The diagnosis requires elevated troponins in conjunction with a clinical history consistent with myocardial ischaemia, ischaemic changes on the ECG, or ancillary evidence of coronary ischaemia on cardiac imaging if available.1
Myocardial injury is defined as a troponin value at or above the 99th percentile upper reference limit derived from a normal reference population.1 This may be acute or chronic.
Types of acute myocardial infarction
Type 1 = plaque rupture
Spontaneous myocardial infarction secondary to atherosclerotic plaque rupture
Type 2 = ischaemic imbalance
Tachyarrhythmia, anaemia, respiratory failure, hypotension/shock, severe hypertension, coronary vasospasm, acute myocarditis
Type 3 = biomarker values unavailable
Cardiac death with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischaemia and presumed new ischaemic ECG changes/left bundle branch block, however death occurred before initial or serial blood samples could be obtained
Type 4 = percutaneous coronary intervention-related
4a – secondary to procedure e.g. coronary dissection, no re-flow, distal embolisation
4b – associated with stent or scaffold thrombosis
4c – in-stent restenosis following balloon angioplasty in infarct territory when no other culprit lesion can be identified
Type 5 = coronary artery bypass grafting-related
Direct traumatic injury to myocardium
It is important to differentiate that an acute myocardial injury may also be termed a type 2 myocardial infarction. In type 2 myocardial infarction, acute atherosclerotic plaque rupture is not a feature.1 The acute myocardial injury arises due to a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand, when there is an acute stressor such as intercurrent illness, acute anaemia or sustained tachyarrhythmia, in patients with known or presumed coronary artery disease. The extent of the injury depends on pre-existing coronary artery disease, non-cardiac comorbidities and the severity of the acute stress.
A chronic elevation of troponin concentrations is more commonly seen in older patients with multiple comorbidities who have non-coronary conditions that result in chronically increased myocardial demands. Examples are chronic renal impairment and chronic heart failure.
All acute care facilities with the capacity to treat myocardial infarction should have systematic processes and infrastructure to expedite urgent consultation with a cardiologist, including telephone consultation.
It is crucial to determine if there is ST-elevation on the ECG and to identify acute arrhythmic and haemodynamic complications. Acute management of such complications should be guided by the Australian Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Advanced Life Support,2 in addition to support from intensive care or emergency medical retrieval services.
Aspirin and other drugs are used in the early management of acute coronary syndrome.
Glyceryl trinitrate is a potent vasodilator used to increase coronary blood flow. It is given sublingually or via intravenous infusion to provide symptom relief. Due to the potential adverse effect of hypotension, it should not be used if patients are hypotensive, or taking a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor.
Morphine and fentanyl are potent analgesics. They are recommended for the relief of ischaemic chest pain.
The routine use of oxygen supplementation is not recommended in patients who are not hypoxic.
Patients with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) require interventions to re-establish coronary blood flow and minimise morbidity and mortality. This can be achieved by percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolytic therapy. Patient choice, ischaemic and bleeding risks must be carefully considered,3 especially in patients with significant comorbidity or a short life expectancy.
In the absence of life-limiting comorbidities and contraindications, patients presenting within 12 hours of the onset of chest pain require emergency reperfusion. Primary percutaneous intervention is preferred if it can feasibly be performed within 90 minutes of first medical contact.4 For Australians unable to reach a capable facility within this time, fibrinolytic therapy remains a life-saving option and should be administered promptly.5 Early transfer for primary percutaneous intervention within 24 hours is reasonable,6 however immediate transfer for rescue primary percutaneous intervention is critical if fibrinolytic therapy fails. This is evidenced by a reduction of 50% or less in ST-elevation on an ECG 60–90 minutes post-fibrinolysis, haemodynamic instability or persistent chest pain.7
Compared to STEMI, the diagnosis of a non-STEMI is more complex to establish, due to the rising incidence of non-type 1 myocardial infarctions and myocardial injuries. Interpretation of the complete clinical presentation in the context of the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction is recommended rather than relying on troponin elevation alone. After a diagnosis of non-STEMI has been confirmed, acute management includes antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation, and coronary investigation should be considered. This is because rates of recurrent myocardial infarction, refractory angina and rehospitalisation for recurrent acute coronary syndrome can be significantly decreased with percutaneous revascularisation.8-12 In the absence of life-limiting comorbidities and contraindications, further investigation with primary percutaneous intervention should be considered especially if the patient has risk factors including diabetes, renal failure and heart failure.
In addition to reperfusion, drug therapy improves the outcomes of acute coronary syndrome.
Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome management.
Oral aspirin significantly reduces the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, strokes and death at 12 months post-myocardial infarction.13 In the absence of contraindications, a loading dose of 300 mg should be given as soon as possible after the patient presents. Maximum platelet inhibition occurs within two hours.
P2Y12 inhibitors available in Australia are clopidogrel and ticagrelor. The choice of drug varies between regions, however clinical guidelines recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the absence of other considerations such as a need for long-term oral anticoagulation, an elevated bleeding risk or concerns about patient adherence with ticagrelor’s twice-daily dosing regimen. This recommendation is due to a greater reduction in the 12-month composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, stroke and myocardial infarction with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel.14 Patients should be given loading doses of ticagrelor (180 mg) or clopidogrel (600 mg or 300 mg) at the time of diagnosis. Peak platelet inhibition occurs within two hours with ticagrelor, two hours with clopidogrel 600 mg and eight hours with clopidogrel 300 mg.15
Pre-treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors before coronary angiography is not necessary, in the absence of very high-risk features including ongoing chest pain or anticipated delays in angiography or the transfer to a primary percutaneous intervention centre, as pre-treatment does not reduce ischaemic events. Furthermore, the likelihood of requiring coronary artery bypass grafting surgery should be considered before administering P2Y12 inhibitors. Patients with haemodynamic instability or extensive ischaemic ECG changes are more likely to require surgery, and P2Y12 inhibitor therapy can delay surgery and increase perioperative bleeding.
The goal of anticoagulation in acute coronary syndrome is to prevent clot propagation or reformation, in combination with antiplatelet therapy. Enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin may be used.
In the case of fibrinolysis for patients with a STEMI, an intravenous bolus of enoxaparin 0.3 mg/kg is recommended for patients under 75 years old (not recommended above 75 years). This is followed by subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg (up to a maximum dose 100 mg in people with normal renal function) and 0.75 mg/kg above the age of 75 years.
Anticoagulation should continue until a primary percutaneous intervention is performed. If a conservative, non-invasive strategy is adopted, anticoagulation should be given for at least 48 hours, or for the duration of hospitalisation up to eight days.16-18 The patient’s renal function should be checked before determining the ongoing anticoagulant dose.
Following acute management of myocardial infarction, secondary prevention strategies should start before the patient leaves hospital (see Table).19 These strategies are vital in minimising the risk of further atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. Additionally, referral for cardiac rehabilitation is recommended for patients recovering from acute coronary syndrome.
Table - Drugs used in secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome
Continue indefinitely unless contraindicated.
Continue for at least 12 months post-acute coronary syndrome, irrespective of whether coronary revascularisation has occurred, due to reduction in risk of recurrent acute coronary syndrome, stroke or death.
Continuation beyond 12 months should be decided in conjunction with the treating cardiologist.
The highest tolerated dose of statins should be continued indefinitely to achieve low-density lipoprotein targets ≤1.8 mmol/L.
Consider addition of ezetimibe.
Consider PCSK9 inhibitor therapy if low-density lipoprotein remains >2.6 mmol/L despite maximally tolerated doses of statin and ezetimibe.
Post-acute coronary syndrome, ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist limit infarct size and left ventricular remodelling, and reduce overall cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke.3
These drugs should be increased to the highest tolerated doses for maximum benefit, especially if there is concurrent hypertension or left ventricular dysfunction.19 Blood pressure targets of 130–140 mmHg systolic and 80–90 mmHg diastolic should be considered.
The benefit of beta blockers is equivocal in patients with preserved left ventricular function, especially beyond one year after infarction, in the modern era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. They can be used, however, if further antihypertensive drugs are required.
The guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes have evolved beyond providing a static framework to ensure timely coronary intervention to decrease morbidity and mortality. They now compel greater clinical judgement in redefining myocardial injury and myocardial infarction. This includes consideration of the patient’s bleeding and ischaemic risk profile before intervention. The aim is to ensure delivery of appropriate care for the patients most likely to derive therapeutic benefits.
Conflicts of interest: Derek Chew’s institution has received research funds from AstraZeneca.
This article is peer-reviewed.
Cardiology advanced trainee, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network
Matthew Flinders fellow and Professor in Cardiology, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network