Digital health: dashboards, dashboards everywhere

Letter

The editorial on digital health and prescribing effectively highlights the potential for digital innovation, including the visual representation of analytics, to assist with current healthcare challenges.¹ Digital dashboards, in the correct circumstances, can display evidence-based key performance indicators (such as for stroke),² and improve outcomes.³ However, dashboards can also misdirect attention and resources. As they become evermore ubiquitous, it is necessary to be mindful of dashboard shortcomings.

With increasingly user-friendly data systems accompanying electronic medical records (EMR), and software such as Microsoft Power BI, there will be a democratisation of data access and the ability to create dashboards. However, while they may be created quickly, the time required to view dashboards, and how else that time could be used, needs to be considered.⁴ Furthermore, while data may be more widely available and displayed, this does not necessarily equate to information dissemination.⁵

Dashboards derived from EMR data do not encapsulate all of health care. As in the contemporary book The Tyranny of Metrics, attention may be drawn away from unmeasured areas of importance, such as quality of life, to only those that are reflected in an EMR.⁶

Not all dashboards are created equal. The creation of dashboards should be evidence-based, and low-value dashboards actively discouraged. Gratuitous dashboard generation could negatively impact healthcare systems. Just as one can spend too long looking at a computer rather than the patient in clinic, so too can ineffective dashboards divert time and attention away from what matters.

Rudy Goh
Neurology Registrar, Royal Adelaide Hospital

Stephen Bacchi
Neurology Registrar, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA
Senior Lecturer, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 

Conflicts of interest: none declared

References

1. Austin JA, Barras MA, Sullivan CM. Digital health and prescribing: declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future. Aust Prescr 2023;46:46-7.
2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Acute Stroke Clinical Care Standard. 2019. [cited 2024 Feb 9]
3. Dowding D, Randell R, Gardner P, Fitzpatrick G, Dykes P, Favela J, et al. Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015;84:87-100.
4. Bacchi S, Kovoor J, Gupta A, Tan S, Sherbon T, Bersten A, et al. Improving health care efficiency one click at a time. Intern Med J 2023;53:1261-4.
5. Wan T, Gurupur V. Understanding the Difference Between Healthcare Informatics and Healthcare Data Analytics in the Present State of Health Care Management. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2020;7:2333392820952668.
6. Muller JZ. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press; 2018.

 

Authors’ response

Jodie Austin, Michael Barras and Clair Sullivan, the authors of the editorial, comment:

Adopting any new intervention in health care, from drugs to dashboards, involves weighing up the potential positive and negative outcomes. As mentioned in our editorial, many challenges surround the uptake of clinical analytics, including increased cognitive load on clinicians and the potential for bias in the way information is displayed.¹ However, health care without visibility of real-time data is increasingly unsustainable. As healthcare organisations continue their journey along the horizons of digital transformation, incorporation of co-design methodologies and implementation science are gaining momentum.^2,3 This suggests an awareness that clinical dashboards are not purely an information technology intervention, but are sociotechnical in nature, and consideration of clinician acceptance and adoption, and sustainability are paramount. Not all healthcare organisations have the capacity to incorporate robust research designs into clinical analytics implementation, but at the very least they should be following a checklist or framework.^4,5 We acknowledge more work needs to be done to understand the impact of dashboards on patient care outcomes.^6,7 The goal should always be to provide evidence-based information at the point of care. We agree that not all dashboards are created equal and healthcare organisations need strong governance structures in place to ensure any bespoke dashboard generation is clinically sound and delivered in an ethically appropriate manner.

An interesting approach to clinical review of dashboards in the literature to overcome ‘misdirected attention’ by busy clinicians is to design dashboards for use by a targeted clinical team^8-11 (e.g. rapid response team) or dedicated team member (e.g. quality team nurse).¹¹ No doubt the sociotechnical barriers to not just clinical dashboards but the multifaceted digital health strategies at large will continue to unfold in this digital era. Healthcare providers and clinicians must continue to make judgements as to whether the positives outweigh the negatives for every proposed intervention, dashboards included.

 

Australian Prescriber welcomes Feedback.

 

References 2

1. Austin JA, Barras MA, Sullivan CM. Digital health and prescribing: declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future. Aust Prescr 2023;46:46-7.
2. Ludlow K, Westbrook J, Jorgensen M, Lind KE, Baysari MT, Gray LC, et al. Co-designing a dashboard of predictive analytics and decision support to drive care quality and client outcomes in aged care: a mixed-method study protocol. BMJ Open 2021;11:e048657.
3. Taxter A, Johnson L, Tabussi D, Kimura Y, Donaldson B, Lawson E, et al. Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing. J Particip Med 2022;14:e34735.
4. Verma AA, Trbovich P, Mamdani M, Shojania KG. Grand rounds in methodology: key considerations for implementing machine learning solutions in quality improvement initiatives. BMJ Qual Saf 2024;33:121-31.
5. Ansari B, Martin EG. Development of a usability checklist for public health dashboards to identify violations of usability principles. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022;29:1847-58.
6. Dowding D, Randell R, Gardner P, Fitzpatrick G, Dykes P, Favela J, et al. Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature. Int J Med Inform 2015;84:87-100.
7. Lim HC, Austin JA, van der Vegt AH, Rahimi AK, Canfell OJ, Mifsud J, et al. Toward a Learning Health Care System: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Conceptual Framework for Implementation of Clinical Analytics in a Digital Hospital. Appl Clin Inform 2022;13:339-54.
8. Fletcher GS, Aaronson BA, White AA, Julka R. Effect of a Real-Time Electronic Dashboard on a Rapid Response System. J Med Syst 2017;42:5.
9. Ibrahim H, Sorrell S, Nair SC, Al Romaithi A, Al Mazrouei S, Kamour A. Rapid Development and Utilization of a Clinical Intelligence Dashboard for Frontline Clinicians to Optimize Critical Resources During Covid-19. Acta Inform Med 2020;28:209-13.
10. Mlaver E, Schnipper JL, Boxer RB, Breuer DJ, Gershanik EF, Dykes PC, et al. User-Centered Collaborative Design and Development of an Inpatient Safety Dashboard. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017;43:676-85.
11. Paulson SS, Dummett BA, Green J, Scruth E, Reyes V, Escobar GJ. What Do We Do After the Pilot Is Done? Implementation of a Hospital Early Warning System at Scale. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020;46:207-16.

 

The Editorial Advisory Committee welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by any responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or libellous statements. The letters are sub-edited before publication. Authors are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on publication is final.