Health professionals may not be aware of the relevant support group for a particular patient, or they may forget to suggest that the patient considers joining a group. In such circumstances, exploring the appropriateness of a choice made independently of a professional can have a vital role in the therapeutic relationship. It is not just a matter of finding an organisation, but also enabling patients and their families to work out whether or not this is the appropriate organisation for them. They should establish whether bias may be introduced into the information given by a sponsor such as a drug company or healthcare provider. It is particularly important that any financial ties or sponsorships which may influence their stance on particular matters such as treatments are known when choosing or evaluating a support group.
Does the organisation provide social and emotional support?
The organisation and its members may provide support or empathy, social support, and the opportunity to explore the fact that 'I am not alone', to express feelings or catharsis, express and develop friendship, and explore 'taboo topics' such as sexuality. Provision of information on the illness and its treatment, for example to dispel mystery or uncertainty, can itself be very emotionally supportive.
What are the origins of the organisation?
For example, it is important to know if a group has been formed by people opposed to a particular treatment, or by researchers trying to recruit a cohort of patients for study.
Is the information about disease/disability reputable and appropriate?
Checking whether or not the organisation is drawing upon reputable healthcare information is vital. Where consumer information is used, such as in qualitative research, about the experience of consumers with a particular condition, has a methodology been used which is open to scrutiny?
Is the organisation democratically accountable?
Checking that the organisation has a constitution which allows participation by members and ensures their rights, including the ability to participate in governance, can be important.
Is there information about funding sources and potential conflict of interest?
The organisation in its publicly available literature (such as an annual report) should make clear where it gets its funding from (including funding for projects). Ask carefully if there are any contractual arrangements with pharmaceutical companies or other healthcare providers, as these arrangements may significantly influence the information provided. The problems include possible bias, and even the possibility of recruitment to a particular trial or treatment to the exclusion of others. Indeed organisations that accept such sponsorship may face constraints in critiquing a particular service or drug.
Does the organisation offer helping mechanisms?
For example, does the organisation provide avenues for problem solving and an exchange of ideas where people can offer specific advice or ask questions? Indeed, does it provide an environment of support where no question about a condition is the 'wrong' question?
Is the organisation disease- or treatment- specific?
While some organisations have developed around particular treatments there is much to be said for suggesting that people take a broader approach to self-help. Organisations revolving around a particular treatment can unnecessarily limit options and information options about other treatments and support.
What are the perceptions of others?
Find out what other people including health professionals (other than members of the management of an organisation) think about that organisation and the contribution it can make. Consumers should be encouraged to talk to a health professional if they think the support organisation is providing misleading or questionable information.
What are the fees and charges?
Informed financial consent is vital. People need to know what they actually get for any membership fees and whether this represents value for money for them. It is important to realise that free or subsidised membership may well reflect corporate sponsorship which may be relevant when considering membership.