Many behaviours that can occur in dementia are unlikely to respond to pharmacotherapy at all. For example, there is no drug treatment for wandering, or calling out. A drug cannot be expected to modify behaviours such as shadowing staff, exit-seeking, disrobing or inappropriate voiding. In such cases, the only means by which an antipsychotic may have efficacy is by sedating the person to the point where they are no longer able to engage in such behaviours. This constitutes chemical restraint.
Placebo response rates in randomised controlled trials of antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia are high. This reflects the high rate of spontaneous remission of all these types of symptoms within three months.7 When an antipsychotic has been prescribed and a behaviour subsequently resolves, it may be tempting to conclude that this is because of the drug, however the behaviour may well have settled without the drug.
The behaviours for which antipsychotics may have some benefit are limited to psychosis, agitation and aggression. However, apart from psychosis, the mechanism of action is unclear, so the effects may also represent non-specific sedation.
In Australia, risperidone is the only antipsychotic approved for the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. However, there are data that other antipsychotics are frequently prescribed off label for the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.8 The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme restricts the use of risperidone to behavioural symptoms characterised by psychosis and aggression in those with Alzheimer’s disease, for a 12-week period, and only after non-pharmacological interventions have failed. While there is evidence that risperidone can benefit the specific behavioural and psychological symptoms of agitation and aggression, the effect sizes are small.9
The adverse effect burden of antipsychotic drugs is significant and includes falls, sedation, extrapyramidal adverse effects and death. These problems are often treatment-emergent and related not only to dose, but duration of exposure, underlining the need for frequent monitoring for adverse effects. The limited efficacy of antipsychotics, combined with their poor tolerability and safety profile, makes the obtaining of consent vital before starting any treatment. An assessment of an individual’s capacity to refuse treatment must always be made before seeking proxy consent from an authorised decision maker.