A range of different interventions has been recommended for middle ear infections. Fortunately, many of these have been assessed in randomised controlled trials (see Table 2). This evidence can help with decision making, particularly when discussing options with families.
Acute otitis media
Most children with acute otitis media will improve spontaneously within 14 days and complications from this illness are uncommon. There are data from randomised controlled trials on antibiotics, antihistamines, decongestants, myringotomy and analgesics (see Table 2).2Antihistamines, decongestants and myringotomy showed no benefit.
The options at this stage are symptomatic relief with analgesics and either watchful waiting or antibiotics. Antibiotics are most appropriate in the following children:
- aged less than two years with bilateral acute otitis media
- with acute otitis media with perforation
- at risk of complications like chronic suppurative otitis media or mastoiditis (e.g. Aboriginal children living in remote communities, children with immunodeficiency syndromes)
- those who have already had 48 hours of watchful waiting.4
Aboriginal children in many communities have a relatively high risk of complications and so you would expect this group to be prescribed antibiotic treatment more often. Current national guidelines recommend amoxycillin 50 mg/kg/day in 2–3 daily doses.10
'Wait and see' prescribing
If the child is not in a high risk group but the family prefers antibiotic treatment, the clinician should discuss 'wait and see' prescribing. Provision of a script for an antibiotic along with advice only to use it if the pain persists for 48 hours will reduce antibiotic use by two-thirds (with no negative impact on family satisfaction).11If antibiotics are to be used, there is evidence that a longer course of treatment (at least seven days) is more effective, but the beneficial effects are modest (persistent acute otitis media reduced from 22% to 15%). Amoxycillin is the most often prescribed antibiotic for this indication in Australia. Although some clinicians have strong preferences for other antibiotics, there is no evidence that any one of the commonly used antibiotics is more effective than the others.
Recurrent acute otitis media
Prophylactic antibiotics, adenoidectomy and tympanostomy tube insertion have been assessed in randomised controlled trials (Table 2).2Antibiotics given for 3–6 months are effective but the benefits are modest. A Cochrane review did not find any evidence that alternative antibiotics were more effective than amoxycillin.12The rates of acute otitis media also reduce spontaneously without treatment so that absolute benefits are less impressive than anticipated. Insertion of tympanostomy tubes also appears to reduce acute otitis media and the effect is similar to antibiotics. Either of these options could be considered in those children with very frequent severe infections (especially if occurring before the peak of respiratory illness in winter). However, children with tympanostomy tubes may develop a discharging ear, so this is not a good option in children at increased risk of suppurative infections (including those with immunodeficiency or persistent bacterial rhinosinusitis). For these children, prophylactic antibiotics or prompt antibiotic treatment of infections are probably the more appropriate choices. Consistent with this, the benefits of long-term antibiotics in reducing perforation of the tympanic membrane have been demonstrated in a randomised trial of Aboriginal infants living in a remote community.13In this study, infants with otitis media with effusion were randomised to twice-daily amoxycillin or placebo for up to six months. Episodes of acute otitis media continued to be treated with antibiotics, so benefits were presumably due to the fact that many episodes go unrecognised.
Evidence from randomised controlled trials to assist discussion about managing otitis media
Table 2
|
|
|
|
Question
|
Clinical evidence
|
Source
|
|
Prevention
|
Why didn't the conjugate pneumococcal vaccine prevent all these infections?
|
In 3 studies (39 749 participants), acute otitis media episodes were reduced by 6% (e.g. from 1 to 0.94 episodes per year). Insertion of tympanostomy tubes was reduced from 3.8% to 2.9%.
|
Systematic review15
|
Should children have influenza vaccine?
|
In 11 studies (11 349 participants), there were inconsistent results. There was a modest protection against acute otitis media during influenza season in some studies.
|
Systematic review 16, meta-analysis 17
|
Treatment of initial acute otitis media
|
Do you recommend antihistamines and/or decongestants?
|
In 12 studies (2300 participants), there was no significant difference in persistent acute otitis media at 2 weeks.
|
Systematic review18
|
What about antibiotics?
|
In 8 studies (2287 participants), persistent pain on days 2–7 was reduced from 22% to 16%.
|
Systematic review19
|
|
Analysis of individual patient data from 6 studies (1643 participants) found that persistent pain was reduced from 55% to 30% in children under 2 years with bilateral acute otitis media, and from 53% to 19% in children with acute otitis media with perforation.
|
Meta-analysis of individual patient data 20
|
Is myringotomy worth considering?
|
In 3 studies (812 participants), early treatment failure actually increased from 5% to 20%.
|
Meta-analysis5
|
Do analgesics like paracetamol or ibuprofen help?
|
In 1 study (219 participants), persistent pain on day 2 was reduced from 25% to 9%.
|
Randomised controlled trial 21
|
Treatment of recurrent acute otitis media
|
Is there a role for prophylactic antibiotics?
|
In 16 studies (1483 participants), acute otitis media episodes were reduced from 3 to 1.5 episodes per year.
|
Systematic review12
|
What about adenoidectomy?
|
In 6 studies (1060 participants), there was no significant reduction in rates of acute otitis media.
|
Meta-analysis5, randomised controlled trials 22– 24
|
Do tympanostomy tubes help?
|
In 5 studies (424 participants), acute otitis media episodes were reduced from 2 to 1 episode per year.
|
Meta-analyses 5,25, randomised controlled trial 24
|
Treatment of persistent otitis media with effusion
|
Do antibiotics work?
|
In 9 studies (1534 participants), persistent otitis media with effusion at around 4 weeks was reduced from 81% to 68% (antibiotic courses for 14–30 days).
|
Meta-analysis 5
|
Do tympanostomy tubes help?
|
In 11 studies (about 1300 participants), there was a modest improvement in hearing; 9 decibels at 6 months and 6 decibels at 12 months. There was no improvement in language or cognitive assessment.
|
Systematic review26, meta-analysis of individual patient data27
|
What about antihistamines and decongestants?
|
In 7 studies (1177 participants), there was no difference in persistent otitis media with effusion at 4 weeks (75%).
|
Meta-analysis of individual patient data27, systematic review28
|
Should we try one of those autoinflation devices?
|
In 6 studies (602 participants), there were inconsistent results. There was a modest improvement in tympanometry at 4 weeks in some studies.
|
Systematic review29
|
What about using antibiotics plus oral steroids?
|
In 5 studies (418 participants), persistent otitis media with effusion at 2 weeks was reduced from 75% to 52%.
|
Systematic review 30
|
Treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media
|
Do topical antibiotics work?
|
In 7 studies (1074 participants), persistent chronic suppurative otitis media at 2–16 weeks reduced from around 75% to 20–50%.
|
Systematic review 31,32
|
Can we use ear cleaning alone?
|
In 2 studies (658 participants), there were inconsistent results. There was no reduction in persistent chronic suppurative otitis media at 12–16 weeks (78%) in a large African study.33
|
Systematic review31,32
|
|
Otitis media with effusion
There is evidence from randomised controlled trials on treatment effects of antibiotics, insertion of tympanostomy tubes, autoinflation devices, antihistamines and decongestants, and antibiotics plus steroids (see Table 2).14
A course of watchful waiting may be appropriate initially. For those children who have persistent otitis media with effusion in both ears associated with hearing loss, a trial of antibiotics is reasonable. Insertion of tympanostomy tubes is most appropriate in children where the primary concern is the conductive hearing loss and communication difficulties. In randomised controlled trials of early versus late insertion of ventilation tubes, watchful waiting for 6–12 months did not adversely affect speech and language development. Children with the most severe conductive hearing loss or established speech and language problems are more likely to benefit.
Children who experience frequent suppurative infections (including those with immunodeficiency or persistent bacterial rhinosinusitis) are at greatest risk of developing chronic suppurative otitis media as a complication of tympanostomy tubes. Families should be informed that a small proportion of children will suffer recurrent persistent otitis media with effusion when the tympanostomy tubes are extruded, and may need a second operation. In these children, tympanostomy tubes plus adenoidectomy is a reasonable option.5
Chronic suppurative otitis media
Topical antibiotics, topical antiseptics, systemic antibiotics, and ear cleaning have been investigated in randomised clinical trials (see Table 2).9After a discussion with their doctor, most parents would choose topical antibiotic treatment initially. However, even though this is an effective treatment, prolonged or repeated courses of treatment are often required. If this is the case, topical quinolones will provide a slight benefit in terms of reduced risk of ototoxicity. Under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, ciprofloxacin ear drops are subsidised for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (aged one month or older).