Pharmaceutical company responses to requests for clinical evaluation data
Company
Drug
Manufacturer provided all requested information
AstraZeneca
rosuvastatin
Ferring
quinagolide
Pfizer
eplerenone
Pfizer
sunitinib malate
Roche
bevacizumab
Roche
erlotinib
Roche
epoetin beta
Wyeth
tigecycline
Manufacturer provided some data
Alcon
anecortave acetate
Arrow Pharmaceuticals
butoconazole nitrate
Arrow Pharmaceuticals
solifenacin succinate
Bayer
sorafenib tosylate
Bristol-Myers Squibb
entecavir
CSL
rabies vaccine
EpiPharm
tazarotene
Epitan
eflornithine hydrochloride
GlaxoSmithKline
rotavirus vaccine
Merck Sharp & Dohme
rotavirus vaccine
Merck Sharp & Dohme
human papillomavirus vaccine
Novartis
deferasirox
Orphan
lanthanum carbonate hydrate
Schering-Plough
posaconazole
Servier
strontium ranelate
Company
Drug
Manufacturer had no objection to providing data but did not actually provide it
Novartis
lumiracoxib
Manufacturer declined to supply data
Amgen
palifermin
Genzyme
sevelamer hydrochloride
Novo Nordisk
insulin detemir
Schering
disodium gadoxetate
Manufacturer did not respond to request
Alphapharm
cetuximab
Altana Pharma
ciclesonide
Janssen-Cilag
bortezomib
Novartis
darifenacin hydrobromide
Schering
alemtuzumab
Solvay
moxonidine
Fine-tuning the T-score in 2007
Manufacturers who provide all the information Australian Prescriber requests when assessing a new drug receive the highest score Some companies only provide the approved product information. Although this is helpful, the product information is a public document so does not represent greater transparency. In these cases the T-score from now on will be Manufacturers who say they have no objection to providing information, but then do not deliver it, will be considered to have declined to supply data . The revised T-scores are as follows: