We do not believe the article ‘Medicines for long-term obesity management’1 is consistent with the NPS
MedicineWise philosophy, to provide independent
and evidence-based advice to health professionals.
The concluding statement ‘They [weight-loss drugs]
are useful during the weight loss phase, but are
essential in the maintenance phase’ is contentious
but presented as fact. Despite these drugs being
used for decades, there are still no trials reporting
their benefit on end points, such as cardiovascular
events and death. A Cochrane review of their long-term
effects in people with hypertension found
only one randomised trial reporting cardiovascular
outcomes. This showed no differences in all-cause
mortality or cardiovascular mortality or morbidity.2
Some drugs, such as topiramate, are not approved
in Australia for weight loss, but this was glossed
over. Saying that ‘no one has applied to register it for
treating obesity’ is insufficient justification for off-label
use. The article seems to only consider positive
news on drugs. For example, it says semaglutide
‘is under consideration by European authorities for
the treatment of obesity’, but does not mention
that marketing authorisation was refused for
phentermine/topiramate due to safety concerns.
Despite the author acknowledging that there is no
evidence base to support using a combination of
drugs, several potential combination regimens are
suggested on theoretical grounds. This is not in line
with the evidence-based philosophy that underpins
the work of NPS MedicineWise.
Conflicts of interest also call into question the
independence of some recommendations. It is
now recognised that pharmaceutical sponsorship
may influence the reporting of trial results and
recommendations made about medicines.3
Andy Morgan
Senior lecturer, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic.
Liz Sturgiss
Senior research fellow, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash
University, Melbourne, Vic.