In addition to their antimicrobial properties, there are in vitro and animal data on the immunomodulatory or anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides.1 Effects in humans were initially reported in the treatment of diffuse panbronchiolitis, in which macrolides are associated with improved lung function and prognosis based largely on non-controlled trial data and retrospective studies.1 In cystic fibrosis, treatment for six months is associated with improved respiratory function and reduced respiratory exacerbations.11 Azithromycin produced a small increase in lung function (mean 8.8%) at seven months in patients treated for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplant,12 but was no different compared to placebo for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after haematopoetic stem cell transplant.13
Azithromycin and other macrolides have also been proposed for use in sepsis and epidemic respiratory viral infections to prevent cytokine storm.1 It has been used for various respiratory and non-respiratory inflammatory conditions. However, this use has been controversial due to limited direct clinical evidence for many conditions, and concerns about increased antimicrobial resistance.1,14 New non-antibiotic macrolides may provide immunomodulatory benefits without contributing to antimicrobial resistance.14
Bronchiectasis
In non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials found that azithromycin reduced the number of exacerbations. In adults with bronchiectasis on CT scanning and at least one pulmonary exacerbation treated with antibiotics in the past year, the EMBRACE trial found a reduction in the rate of exacerbations (0.59 vs 1.57) with azithromycin three times weekly for six months compared to placebo.15 The BAT trial found a reduced number of exacerbations (median 0 vs 2) in adults with radiologically confirmed bronchiectasis and at least three respiratory infections treated with antibiotics in the past year (daily azithromycin therapy over 12 months).16 Finally, the Bronchiectasis Intervention Study investigated Australian and New Zealand indigenous children with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis or chronic suppurative lung disease who had had at least one pulmonary exacerbation in the past 12 months. After once-weekly azithromycin for up to 24 months, the incidence of pulmonary exacerbations was half that observed in those given placebo. However, the authors noted a greater incidence of macrolide-resistant bacteria in children treated with azithromycin (46% vs 11%).17
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Trials in children and adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been small with heterogeneous outcomes, and the optimal regimens and subgroups are not yet established. Patients with neutrophilic asthma may benefit from macrolides, but further research is needed.18
A randomised controlled trial of daily azithromycin in patients with variable COPD severity, smoking status and medical management found that azithromycin prolonged time to exacerbation compared to placebo – median 266 days (95% CI* 227–313) versus 174 days (95% CI 143–215) (p<0.001). The rate of exacerbations was 1.48 per patient-year in the azithromycin group, compared with 1.83 in the placebo group (p=0.01). However, there was only a 7% increase in the proportion of people reporting clinically important improvements in quality of life with azithromycin as compared with placebo (43% vs 36%, p=0.03). Patients in the azithromycin arm experienced hearing decrements more frequently (25% vs 20%, p=0.04) and were more likely to be colonised with macrolide-resistant organisms (81% vs 41%, p<0.001). People with a prolonged QT interval were excluded from this study.19