Darren Roberts and Alexandra Bennett, the authors of the editorial, comment:
These questions are important, but the harms and benefits of these treatments for COVID-19 in this age group are poorly defined.
It is increasingly clear that the natural history of COVID-19 reflects risk factors whereby younger age and fewer comorbidities are favourable.2-4 For example, despite a high number of cases of adults under 50 years of age in Australia, only 7% were hospitalised and 0.03% died.5 In India, mortality has been reported as 0.4% in those under 40 years of age.6
Randomised controlled trials are needed to quantify the efficacy of antiviral treatments for reducing COVID-19 disease progression.1 To our knowledge there are no trials in young adults with mild disease. However, death and other adverse effects to antivirals in COVID-19 have been reported, but mostly in patients with severe disease so the observation may be confounded by indication.7 Therefore, more data are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of antivirals in lower severity COVID-19. In Australia, the use of antiviral treatments outside a clinical trial is not recommended8 and we support this.
It seems reasonable to assume that general health advice for other mild infections, as described by Manjiri Gharat, also apply in COVID-19. We are not aware of data supporting a benefit of antipyretics in COVID-19. However, some authors have questioned their safety in COVID-19 including paracetamol-associated acute hepatitis9 and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated systemic infection.10 These risks appear theoretical so are insufficient to advise against the use of antipyretics, but more data are required.