Neil Hotham and Elizabeth Hotham, the authors of the article, comment:
We thank Dr Craig for his comments and recognise that inclusion in the list of contraindicated drugs without qualification could be misleading. It is important for women to discuss any concerns with a specialist. In addition, there is sound advice available from the centres and references cited in our article.
It is essential to distinguish between radiopharmaceuticals. There is universal agreement that iodide (131I) is incompatible with breastfeeding, as the iodide concentrates not only in the maternal thyroid gland but also in breast tissue and breast milk. Permanent discontinuation is advised.2
For other radiopharmaceuticals, such as technetium, recommendations related to breastfeeding should be cognisant of the radioactive half-life of the pharmaceutical. For some, no interruption of breastfeeding is necessary, whereas for others, expressing breast milk for periods from 3–48 hours has been recommended (based on the individual isotope). Hale and Rowe advise that, for any radiopharmaceutical, the withdrawal period for higher doses should be a minimum of five half-lives of radioactivity and possibly up to 10.4
By comparison, for non-radioactive products such as gadolinium-based and iodinated contrast media, there is expert consensus that no interruption of breastfeeding is necessary.5 Despite this, the Australian product information for these products has a range of suspension recommendations from 24 hours (meglumine diatrizoate and sodium diatrizoate) to complete cessation (meglumine iothalamate). These examples highlight the pitfalls of relying on the product information in clinical practice.