Ian Whyte and Frank Reimann, the authors of the article, comment:
Thank you for your question about the role empagliflozin may have played in our patient’s cascade of symptoms.
While the patient’s diarrhoea and neurological findings could not be related to empagliflozin, the biochemical abnormalities were consistent with euglycaemic ketoacidosis.1 Empagliflozin can produce this complication in the presence of physiological stress.3 However, the patient’s blood ketone concentrations were only mildly raised, and the large anion gap was better explained by renal failure. Further, the abnormalities had normalised by 48 hours without administration of insulin or glucose solutions.
The case report highlights a potential role of empagliflozin in facilitating lithium excretion.2 Although sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors can acutely increase lithium renal clearance by decreasing proximal sodium reabsorption, the effect is transient and, within a month, compensated for by a rise in plasma renin activity and aldosterone.4 This makes it unlikely that the patient's long-term empagliflozin was affecting his lithium clearance. Additionally, for SGLT2 inhibitors to exert an effect on the renal tubule, sufficient kidney function would have been required.
In the context of acute illness and severe kidney injury, most of the patient’s regular medicines could have caused mishaps and required sick-day plans.