Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is the most common type of leukaemia in the industrialised world, accounting for 40% of all leukaemias in people over 65 years old. Whereas previously many patients presented with lymphadenopathy or symptoms related to bone marrow failure, nowadays over 90% of cases are diagnosed in asymptomatic patients after a blood test is performed for another reason. The median age at presentation is 65-70, but 20-30% of patients are aged below 55 at diagnosis. In most patients the aetiology of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cannot be established. However, there is an association with some industrial pollutants, and the first-degree relatives of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia are about five times more likely to develop the disorder than the general population.
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia results from a monoclonal expansion of mature lymphocytes. The malignant clone demonstrates a characteristic phenotype, with cells expressing CD5, CD19, CD20, CD23, light chain restriction and, in cases associated with a poor prognosis, CD38. These findings are sufficiently specific for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia that a bone marrow examination is no longer considered necessary to make a definitive diagnosis.
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is generally incurable without allogeneic transplantation. It often progresses slowly, so treatment is generally reserved until there is clear evidence of disease progression, such as progressive bone marrow failure, autoimmune cytopenia, progressive splenomegaly, bulky lymphadenopathy, frequent infections or systemic symptoms. The choice of therapy depends on whether one is aiming for palliation or for complete remission in the hope that this will translate into prolonged survival.
Options for initial therapy include single drug chemotherapy with chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide or the purine analogue, fludarabine. Recent randomised trials have shown that fludarabine leads to higher complete response rates and greater response duration, but not to improved survival when compared with chlorambucil.6 These results have led to the increasing use of fludarabine in multidrug regimens.
The most widely used combination includes fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, given over three days each month for three to six months. Over 90% of patients respond to this regimen, with 70% attaining a complete response, compared to a complete response rate of less than 5% with chlorambucil alone.7 Early reports suggest that this may translate into prolonged survival, although this remains to be shown in long-term studies. The major limitation of fludarabine-based regimens is the risk of infection due to the profound immunosuppression associated with such regimens.
There are a number of treatment options available for relapsed or refractory disease including fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab, cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisolone, the same drugs combined with doxorubicin (CHOP), and the monoclonal antibody, alemtuzumab.
Recent studies suggest that allogeneic transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning may offer the best possibility of long-term disease-free survival. However, this is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity and is really only an option for patients aged under 65 years.