Editor, – Dr P. Hazell (Aust Prescr 1995;18:60-3) and Professor R. Adler (Aust Prescr 1995;18:64), writing on stimulant treatment for ADHD, demonstrate the 'medical model' approach to the problem.
Further consideration of the DSM-IV Dr Hazell refers to, may enable one to determine some common characteristics of personality amongst the parents in these cases. This then becomes a delicate matter. Having brought their child for treatment to various medical specialists authorised to prescribe methylphenidate and amphetamines for ADHD, parents may not take kindly to any suggestion that the origins of the problem of the child are rooted in their personalities and that the child's best chance of staying out of gaol as an adult, or being killed or seriously injured in a motor accident, or becoming psychotic, lies in the parents entering therapy as well.
This is hardly a popular concept and an even less popular option. It can be applicable for a myriad of 'medical' problems, with not only parents, but also often medical practitioners, loathe to consult appropriately trained psychologists. Whilst, as Dr Hazell says, there is evidence of brain injury in some cases, remember ADHD was also known as 'minimal brain dysfunction' before the euphemism 'ADHD' was invented to make parents and child and others more comfortable with the diagnosis.
The realistic possibility of schizophrenia in early adulthood is better faced at the outset. Whilst I see no value in causing patients or their relatives undue concern, they might better appreciate some indication of what the future might hold.
Karl R. Wood
Pharmacist and Member
Psychologists' Association of Australia
Cabramatta, N.S.W.